Tag Archive for 'communication'

The Organization of War

Every once in a while, some interesting data is put on the Internet that organization studies just eat up. Back in 2004, for example, the Enron e-mail dataset provided a unique chance to study the downfall of a company as brought on by its accounting malpractice (a.k.a. fraud).

This week marks a similarly interesting case, the leak of 76,911 secret US military reports by WikiLeaks, now known as the Kabul War Diary. The data has already been taking apart by The New York Times, The Guardian, and Der Spiegel, but scientist (e.g., Drew Conway over at Zero Intelligence Agents) are only beginning to engulf themselves in the data.

With a particular interest in the communicative constitution of organization, I dove into the data myself and dug up what I deem to be the organization of war. Take a look at the below graph.

The Organization of the Afghan War

The 200+ vertices represent military units and the 600+ edges represent communication between them. A short note, the reports feature more than 1,500 units, but I got rid of the isolates. Moreover, I assume communication to take place between units if these are at the same time in the same place. All of this information is in the reports, which “need to answer the critical questions: Who, When, Where, What, With whom, by what Means and Why” (WikiLeaks, 2010).

In addition to the graph, I pulled some quick network measures out of the magic R hat:

degree betweenness closeness
A SIGACTS MANAGER 0.743119266 0.598042676 0.03356428
CJTF-82 0.23853211 0.372130537 0.033369049
DRUID – ISAF 0.165137615 0.048233629 0.032727819
- 0.146788991 0.052302377 0.032708177
CJSOTF-A 0.146788991 0.044388154 0.03270327
205th RCAG 0.137614679 0.033400777 0.032698365
TF PALADIN LNO 0.128440367 0.045990081 0.032826382
TF MTN Warrior SIGACT Manager 0.091743119 0.039942079 0.032708177
TF East JOC Watch 0.073394495 0.034323879 0.032722906
TF GUARDIAN 0.064220183 0.049139513 0.033115601

As you can see, the two central vertices are A SIGACTS MANAGER and CJTF-82, which are some managerial unit for significant activities (i.e., SIGACTS) and the Combined Joint Task Force 82. Both are important military units as their communication with others provides the proverbial glue to the organizational network.

My research is far from finished, but right now this initial shot at the data is just for play. If you’re interested in the edge list that I generated from the reports, drop me a line, I’d be happy to share.

Connecting Communications

Some things are hard to translate. The writings of Niklas Luhmann are certainly among them. His work on a grand theory of society (Theorie der Gesellschaft) offers a highly idiosyncratic language that is hard to follow and even harder to translate, indeed. No wonder orgtheory.net poses the Luhmann Challenge to give “an example of an empirical phenomenon or puzzle that was clarified, explained, or resolved using autopoeisis or any other of Luhmann’s concepts.”

Personally, I have a love/hate relationship with Luhmann. I rely a great deal on his work in my own dissertation, which already its title reveals: Structures and Dynamics of Autopoietic Organizations. Translating his language from German to English has never been a pleasure. Just think about the concept of Anschlusskommunikation which, in blunt words, points out that communication now and here comes about previous communication and already serves future communication. Anschlusskommunikation, one neat little German word, no English translation. Connecting communication? Connectivity of communication? Nothing really fits.

It’s not just the missing translation for many of Luhmann’s concepts, it’s the very Anschlusskommunikation of his writings to other scientific communities that’s missing. The real challenge with respect to Luhmann, in may opinion, is to be inspired by his work, and then leave him behind to continue in your own direction. Connecting communications may just be the way to do that.

Mapping Political Agendas

It’s generally a good idea to stay on one’s scientific home turf. After all, it takes quite a while to master a particular theory, let alone an entire discipline. However, interdisciplinary research is a must nowadays, so it’s accepted practice to stray in uncharted territory. With an invitation to speak at a political science workshop in Spring 2010, I apply my ideas of inside-out networks to the communications of the Deutscher Bundestag (i.e., the German Parliament), thus mapping the respective political agenda.

Continue reading ‘Mapping Political Agendas’

Inside-Out Networks

I’m that guy who loves to talk about networks. Networks in general. All of them. Social networks, a little bit. You know, Facebook, Twitter, the whole nine media yards. More importantly, though, I’m that guy who loves to talk about networks that no one else is thinking of. Networks of Communications. Plural. With an s in the end.

Continue reading ‘Inside-Out Networks’